The Move To Cut Social Security Would Impoverish Millions Of Americans

Ought to be required studying: The article within the Palm Beach Post by the renowned columnist Frank Cerabino on how proposed social safety fixes would impoverish over 1 million Floridians (to not point out tens of millions of different Individuals). This text ought to be required not only for retirees however particularly for all choice makers.

As Cerabino makes clear, “For greater than 1,000,000 older Floridians, this federal retirement financial savings program is what’s maintaining them from residing beneath the poverty line.” And but, he factors out, “there’s a brand new push to chop it.” Why? Effectively as a result of so-called consultants and coverage makers say that the fund that ensures the funds might be depleted by 2034 except one thing is finished. These critics additionally say that Social Safety might be bankrupt as a result of all of the retiring child boomers are actually certified to take their profit. Couple that with the less numbers of staff supporting the fund, and voila, the disaster.

ADVERTISEMENT

However these so-called consultants and coverage makers will not be being completely sincere about it. What they aren’t telling you is that 2034 is definitely the 12 months when the RESERVE is depleted. Seems that the Social Safety Outdated-Age and Survivors Insurance coverage Belief Fund has been working a surplus for years. Really for many years. The scare techniques getting used as an excuse to chop Social Safety is, for my part, hype. As quoted in Cerabino’s article, the Social Safety Administration mentioned “After the projected belief fund reserve depletion in 2034, persevering with revenue could be enough to pay 78 p.c of program price, declining to 74 p.c for 2095.” First, that assumes there isn’t a major enhance within the variety of staff who contribute. Second, it’s assuming there aren’t any adjustments made to eligibility similar to elevating the age at which retirees turn out to be absolutely eligible or elevating the cap on the contribution from taxable wages. That’s my private bugaboo. This 12 months, solely the primary $160,200 of earnings is topic to Social Safety deductions. Though that’s a hefty enhance from final 12 months, my query is, why is there any cap on taxable wages? There’s no cap for Medicare. So why solely on Social Safety?

The longstanding argument for not having a cap on contributions is that Social Safety shouldn’t be a welfare program designed to supply a security web however relatively, an insurance coverage program through which your contribution is tied to the quantity you obtain as a profit. And since there’s a cap on the profit you may obtain, there then should even be a cap to the quantity you pay in. So if in 2095 three quarters of this system prices might be coated by the continued revenue with no different fixes, why are choice makers dashing to chop advantages so drastically? Do they not understand the profound impact it should have?

The information are staggering. What’s surprising to me are the numbers. As quoted in Cerabino’s article, The Middle on Price range and Coverage Priorities said, “With out Social Safety advantages, 37.8 p.c of older adults would have incomes beneath the official poverty line. With Social Safety advantages, solely 9 p.c do.” And in keeping with the SSA, 21% of married {couples}, 45% of single retirees, and 15% of ladies depend on Social Safety for over 90% of their revenue. The typical quantity of Social Safety advantages acquired is simply $1,550 monthly. So even in the event you personal your house and don’t have a home fee, there’s no manner you’re going to be nice with revenue of solely $1,550 monthly. That quantity is simply barely above the poverty line for one particular person and is beneath the poverty line for a household of two or extra.

ADVERTISEMENT

Guaranteeing that Social Safety is funded for future generations is a crucial objective that ought to be mentioned and analyzed completely. However drastically slicing the advantages based mostly on deceptive knowledge shouldn’t be the way in which ahead.