Grant Shapps vows to ‘max out’ UK’s North Sea oil and gas reserves

Obtain free UK vitality updates

We’ll ship you a myFT Every day Digest e mail rounding up the most recent UK vitality information each morning.

Grant Shapps, vitality minister, has insisted that the federal government will “max out” the UK’s remaining reserves of North Sea oil and fuel, arguing that is suitable with Britain’s pledge to achieve web zero carbon emissions by 2050.

Labour chief Keir Starmer has stated the UK will grant no new North Sea licences if his get together wins the subsequent normal election, however wouldn’t revoke current contracts.

In an interview with the Monetary Occasions, Shapps described the Labour coverage as “insanity”, and stated licences ought to be granted for all viable oil and gasfields as long as this was in keeping with the web zero ambitions.

“What Labour foolishly and irresponsibly need to do is intentionally pursue a coverage of self-harm by not taking that [North Sea] oil and fuel however shopping for it from overseas,” he stated.

Even when the business “maxed out” all potential North Sea contracts, he stated, there would nonetheless be a speedy slowdown in manufacturing as a result of it was a mature basin that was operating out of hydrocarbons.

“The IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change], who’s the worldwide authority on this, says that to satisfy web zero by 2050 the world wants to scale back its reliance on oil and fuel by 4 per cent a 12 months,” he stated.

“Even when we granted each single conceivable licence to the North Sea . . . the [UK’s oil production] would decline at 7 per cent a 12 months, twice the speed of the IPCC [recommendations].”

Shapps argued that the choice to utilizing British hydrocarbons because the UK transitioned to a greener economic system was to import fossil fuels from overseas, which generally concerned extra carbon emissions.

This would go away Britain on the mercy of “Putin or anybody else who desires to carry us to ransom”, he stated, referring to the Russian president whose invasion of Ukraine precipitated world oil and fuel costs to surge.

The UK has phased out Russian oil and fuel imports, persevering with to import from suppliers together with the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia and the US.

“There is no such thing as a choice however to hold on shopping for these things, I don’t perceive why it’s acceptable to purchase oil and fuel and LNG [liquefied natural gas] . . . from all these different nations whereas denying ourselves the power to service our personal folks and economic system,” he stated.

“And even worse, do it at a better expense and twice the carbon emissions. It merely doesn’t make sense.”

Ed Miliband, shadow vitality secretary, stated the Tory authorities had left Britain susceptible to the current world vitality disaster triggered by the Ukraine battle.

The Labour MP argued that Shapps’ pro-extraction method wouldn’t scale back payments nor enhance vitality safety, whereas “driving a coach and horses” by way of Britain’s local weather commitments.

“Each revered professional, from the Worldwide Power Company to the Local weather Change Committee has warned the federal government of the risks of this coverage,” he stated.

The Workplace for Funds Duty, the fiscal watchdog, stated in its dangers report this month that “persevering with our dependence on fuel on the present stage may, in an adversarial situation, be as costly fiscally as finishing the transition to web zero”.

British educational Rachel Kyte, dean emerita of the Fletcher Faculty at Tufts College, criticised the “weird” statements coming from ministers on fossil fuels, warning the UK was susceptible to lacking a chance to draw funding and create jobs by way of the vitality transition.

“The federal government appears unable to understand that future prosperity lies on staying at the vanguard of the clear vitality transition, which is effectively underneath approach,” she stated.

Philip Evans, Greenpeace UK local weather campaigner, known as Shapps’ plan “scaremongering nonsense” given Labour was not proposing an “quick shutdown” of the business.

However David Whitehouse, chief govt of Offshore Energies UK, the oil and fuel commerce group, stated that 200,000 high-value jobs have been in danger from shutting down the North Sea business.

“The figures are clear: the UK has 283 lively oil and gasfields however 180 will shut down by 2030. If we don’t substitute them with new ones, then manufacturing will decline a lot quicker than we will construct low-carbon replacements,” he stated.

“There is no such thing as a easy alternative between oil and fuel on the one hand and renewables on the opposite. The fact is that to maintain the lights on and develop our economic system, we’d like each.”